DDrawLedger

Observatory

Compare lotteries side by side

Every game tracked on this site, compared on the numbers that actually matter: the size of the pool, the odds of a jackpot, and how historical draw behavior lines up across games with very different rules.

GameFormatDrawsJackpot oddsMean sumDraws w/ consecutiveLongest absenceRepeats/draw
Lotto 6/49

Canada

6/49 + 1/494,4401 in 13.98M151.749.1%1.8% of history0.73
Lotto Max

Canada

7/50 + 1/501,2481 in 99.88M176.262.4%40.5% of history1.02
Daily Grand

Canada

5/49 + 1/71,0201 in 13.35M125.434.1%8.7% of history0.52
Powerball

United States

5/69 + 1/261,9841 in 292.2M168.828.1%31.0% of history0.38
New York Lotto

New York

6/592,6031 in 45.06M180.443.5%3.2% of history0.62
EuroMillions

Europe

5/50 + 2/121,9751 in 139.8M127.634.8%4.5% of history0.49

What lines up across games

Despite very different formats, the behavioral metrics cluster tightly: consecutive pairs appear in roughly half of all draws, the mean sum tracks the mathematical midpoint of each pool, and repeats between consecutive draws sit near k²/pool. Different games, same underlying randomness — which is exactly what you'd expect from fair draws.

What doesn't line up

The odds. Pool size is the single biggest lever on jackpot odds — a 6/49 game is ~20× easier to hit than a 5/69 + bonus game. That's math, not luck. It also means historical stats from one game can never be transferred to another.